12,486
edits
Changes
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
no edit summary
::: I really wouldn't know what to point at as really needing improvements. Yesterday I was looking at the tems articles, wich I think could receive some improvements. I'm not a diablo lore guru, but I've seen a lot of people putting so much effort in that area. I haven't dwelled all the content, generally speaking I think everithing's going fine enought. Maybe the articles just need a bit more linking, sorting and indexing. I've sometimes had troubles finding quickly what I was looking for, and moving from a page to another could be quite tedius.
::: BTW, looking at the amount of info that's allready here, and considering D3 won't be out for quite a while, the wiki is just amazing right now. The comunity is sweet too ^_^-- 12:39, 3 November 2008 [[User:Bandreus|Bandreus]] :::: (BTW, remember to sign comments on Talk pages. Look here for help: [[Help:Talk]]) Sounds good, thanks for the compliments. Too bad only I see them here on your talk page, I am NOT the only contrib, everyone deserve a pat on the back, including YOU now! =D I think you are right. More interlinking, and more indexing. Especially in Diablo2.DiabloWiki.net. For the interlinking, you could make more use by adding stuff for it. Just remember to not link too much ;) About once per word per section of an article is enough =) :::: Also, if you are using FireFox, you should download an English spell checker. It makes it super-easy for you to even help OTHERS with their spelling ;) If you're not using FireFox, you should consider doing so, as it's in my opinion miles ahead of IE7. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 16:00, 3 November 2008 (CET)
