User talk:Azymn/Wizard skills

ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
< User talk:Azymn
Revision as of 06:27, 23 March 2009 by Azymn (talk | contribs) (save the summaries!)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page shows why I prefer separate pages for skills; There's, simply put, little info on the skills at the moment, so each section will most likely grow, making for a hu(uuuu)ge page. --Vipermagi 15:29, 14 March 2009 (CET)

I know what you mean, that's why I felt we should individualize the skills. I'll look in to it today as soon as I have had time to make the Wiki Watch =) --Leord 13:51, 16 March 2009 (CET)
I agree as well, I originally copied this straight from the wiki quite a while ago and I am only now getting to the point of modifying it. Here's my first real stab at it. --Azymn 07:20, 17 March 2009 (CET)
Looks good for a "first stab at it"...--belushi81x 15:32, 18 March 2009 (CET)
I agree, looks very good. I really like the way it looks, and using headlines inside the table is always a good idea with this type of article. The only thing is that people did like the summarized pages of the old D2 info pages, and I am hesitant to radically alter the way we display info from that. That's why I'm working on the little skill box template, for easy linkage.
Regardless, I do like the whole table, and I'm sure we can use it. Perhaps it works better in the Skills page? --Leord 18:57, 18 March 2009 (CET)
I like the old summarized pages too, the blurbs add more flavor for the skill trees. I don't want this to replace those - the summaries could go above this section. This could also be injected at the bottom of the character's page, below those skill tree summaries. Another possibility is an All Skills page, with one of these entries for each character. Leord, I have some ideas for a skill nav that rely on javascript...let's discuss sometime before you get too deep into your skill nav. It would be multitiered-multitab, and fairly low profile. Once we've got javascript and #if templates available, I'll stick a few proof-of-concepts up.
--Azymn 07:27, 23 March 2009 (CET)