Difference between revisions of "Talk:Other classes"

ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Speculation==
 
well so the fifth class cant be represented by a normal char, so it is obviosly very exotic and doesnt take up the same space as normal char. that is my closest speculation. im curious now.
 
well so the fifth class cant be represented by a normal char, so it is obviosly very exotic and doesnt take up the same space as normal char. that is my closest speculation. im curious now.
other plz veiws
+
other plz veiws -- 21:51, 22 February 2009 Deadlyambitions
 +
 
 
:Before I reply let me ask you to sign your posts on talk pages... you have to manually add the line that I'm placing at the bottom.  It makes it easier to read.  Check out the [[Help:Talk]] article.  Dating them also helps put comments in context... like if someone comes over here and looks at this talk page after the 4th class is released...
 
:Before I reply let me ask you to sign your posts on talk pages... you have to manually add the line that I'm placing at the bottom.  It makes it easier to read.  Check out the [[Help:Talk]] article.  Dating them also helps put comments in context... like if someone comes over here and looks at this talk page after the 4th class is released...
 
:That said the two theories I like best are shape-shifter and summoner.  It should be easy to make an NPC frame take the place of any class... maybe with a shape-shifter you couldn't... tho I would think you could just pick a different NPC for the other form... also it would seem like with a summoner you could use NPC or MOB graphics as the summons...  
 
:That said the two theories I like best are shape-shifter and summoner.  It should be easy to make an NPC frame take the place of any class... maybe with a shape-shifter you couldn't... tho I would think you could just pick a different NPC for the other form... also it would seem like with a summoner you could use NPC or MOB graphics as the summons...  
 
:--[[User:Belushi81x|Belushi81x]] 12:52, 23 February 2009 (CET)
 
:--[[User:Belushi81x|Belushi81x]] 12:52, 23 February 2009 (CET)
 +
 +
::Thanks for holding the fort, Belushi!
 +
 +
::Personally, I think that the summoner is very possible, but a little bit of his mandate is weakened by the fact that the [[Witch Doctor]] actually has summons AT ALL. I think we'll DEFINITELY see a ranged non-magic or semi-magic class, much like an Amazon, and the Summoner is having to battle it out with a Melee/Magic user, similar to a Paladin, or similar class... (A [[Dervish]])? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 16:24, 26 February 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 15:24, 26 February 2009

Speculation

well so the fifth class cant be represented by a normal char, so it is obviosly very exotic and doesnt take up the same space as normal char. that is my closest speculation. im curious now. other plz veiws -- 21:51, 22 February 2009 Deadlyambitions

Before I reply let me ask you to sign your posts on talk pages... you have to manually add the line that I'm placing at the bottom. It makes it easier to read. Check out the Help:Talk article. Dating them also helps put comments in context... like if someone comes over here and looks at this talk page after the 4th class is released...
That said the two theories I like best are shape-shifter and summoner. It should be easy to make an NPC frame take the place of any class... maybe with a shape-shifter you couldn't... tho I would think you could just pick a different NPC for the other form... also it would seem like with a summoner you could use NPC or MOB graphics as the summons...
--Belushi81x 12:52, 23 February 2009 (CET)
Thanks for holding the fort, Belushi!
Personally, I think that the summoner is very possible, but a little bit of his mandate is weakened by the fact that the Witch Doctor actually has summons AT ALL. I think we'll DEFINITELY see a ranged non-magic or semi-magic class, much like an Amazon, and the Summoner is having to battle it out with a Melee/Magic user, similar to a Paladin, or similar class... (A Dervish)? --Leord 16:24, 26 February 2009 (CET)