Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dragonhelmuk"

ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Lamprey D2 Link)
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
:And I don't mind, write wherever it's relevant I guess. I'm still a bit confused about why there's a need for two wikis - don't you get loads of duplicate information? --[[User:Dragonhelmuk|Dragonhelmuk]] 04:46, 20 January 2009 (CET)
 
:And I don't mind, write wherever it's relevant I guess. I'm still a bit confused about why there's a need for two wikis - don't you get loads of duplicate information? --[[User:Dragonhelmuk|Dragonhelmuk]] 04:46, 20 January 2009 (CET)
 +
 +
:: Haha, indeed, it's the same (almost)! ;)
 +
 +
:: Regarding the two wikis you're right, it's slightly confusing, but a decision we made some time ago, since other wikis with multiple games usually get even more confusing. Especially in this case when we had so much material already at hand, and wanting to make sure we have that available in an easy navigation. It would have been too much work to incorporate the two, wince the Diablo 2 wiki needs a lot of restructuring and more links to be up to par. It's excellent, and probably the best source of info out there today, but the availability needs to be better, and spending all energy on that would mean no work on D3 stuff.
 +
 +
:: Anyway, I am hoping that we will be able to implement D2W nicely into the main DiabloWiki in the future without any major hickups, but there is still so much to do, so it's not even on the agenda yet. Also, some of us actuall likes it better this way, we'll see how the final solution will be. another way is to use the interwiki-templates I made to link them together better, and to easily separate them.
 +
 +
:: So, do you think you got time for other little wiki edits, or is this the peak of your creativity? ;) --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 16:29, 23 January 2009 (CET)

Revision as of 15:29, 23 January 2009

Lamprey D2 Link

Very nice addition with the Lamprey's link to D2! Do you prefer if I leave messages here on D3W or on the other one? --Leord 14:02, 19 January 2009 (CET)

No problem, I was just browsing through the list of edited/created pages and I thought: "How could Leord have forgotten my favourite monster, the Pain Worm!?"
Actually I lie, I really thought: "How could Leord have forgotten those half-invisible little worm-y things spawned by the annoying glowing things?" And then spent 10 minutes getting my facts straight and editing the page... But it's all the same right? ;>
And I don't mind, write wherever it's relevant I guess. I'm still a bit confused about why there's a need for two wikis - don't you get loads of duplicate information? --Dragonhelmuk 04:46, 20 January 2009 (CET)
Haha, indeed, it's the same (almost)! ;)
Regarding the two wikis you're right, it's slightly confusing, but a decision we made some time ago, since other wikis with multiple games usually get even more confusing. Especially in this case when we had so much material already at hand, and wanting to make sure we have that available in an easy navigation. It would have been too much work to incorporate the two, wince the Diablo 2 wiki needs a lot of restructuring and more links to be up to par. It's excellent, and probably the best source of info out there today, but the availability needs to be better, and spending all energy on that would mean no work on D3 stuff.
Anyway, I am hoping that we will be able to implement D2W nicely into the main DiabloWiki in the future without any major hickups, but there is still so much to do, so it's not even on the agenda yet. Also, some of us actuall likes it better this way, we'll see how the final solution will be. another way is to use the interwiki-templates I made to link them together better, and to easily separate them.
So, do you think you got time for other little wiki edits, or is this the peak of your creativity? ;) --Leord 16:29, 23 January 2009 (CET)