Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reference"
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
− | :It's meant to be a master list. Which is necessarily long. The D2-specific terms might be removed once D3 is out, and they fade from relevance. There's a similar list in the D2 wiki with just D1 and D2 terms for that. If the page loading times become unwieldy, it could be split into two halves, at "N" or wherever makes a nearly-even division. | + | :It's meant to be a master list. Which is necessarily long. The D2-specific terms might be removed once D3 is out, and they fade from relevance. There's a similar list in the D2 wiki with just D1 and D2 terms for that. If the page loading times become unwieldy, it could be split into two halves, at "N" or wherever makes a nearly-even division. --[[User:Flux|Flux]] 13:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC) |
− | --[[User:Flux|Flux]] 13:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:47, 14 September 2010
This page is pretty ridiculously large, and will only grow after DIII is released. I can't imagine this loading fully on slower connections; when a page has to load more than 45 seconds, it times out; this happens to the Median TU list to a noticable amount of people (note that the list used to be a little larger; approx. 1/6th more). The D I/II/III images don't help on the matter either. May I ask what sparked the idea to merge three pages full of abbreviations? --Vipermagi 13:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
- It's meant to be a master list. Which is necessarily long. The D2-specific terms might be removed once D3 is out, and they fade from relevance. There's a similar list in the D2 wiki with just D1 and D2 terms for that. If the page loading times become unwieldy, it could be split into two halves, at "N" or wherever makes a nearly-even division. --Flux 13:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)