Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rings"
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
DxAxxxTyriel (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The entry listed rings qualities mentioning Legendary and Set ring variants. So far set items aren't confirmed yet. Also there is no confirmation for the existence of a legendary item quality. | The entry listed rings qualities mentioning Legendary and Set ring variants. So far set items aren't confirmed yet. Also there is no confirmation for the existence of a legendary item quality. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Legendary or high quality items will exist, and there is a high chance rings will be among them, amulets too... in D2 some sets had rings in them, so if there will be sets in D3 (Jay said that they wanna have set items in D3 but as long as they are good, Or something like that), then rings might be among them.... the game isnt released yet and it has 2 wiki's, so no info is credible... and if no info is credible, then whats the point of having a wiki bout it? Some amount of guessing must be there.... --[[User:DxAxxxTyriel|DxAxxxTyriel]] 20:35, 4 April 2009 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 18:35, 4 April 2009
The entry listed rings qualities mentioning Legendary and Set ring variants. So far set items aren't confirmed yet. Also there is no confirmation for the existence of a legendary item quality.
- Legendary or high quality items will exist, and there is a high chance rings will be among them, amulets too... in D2 some sets had rings in them, so if there will be sets in D3 (Jay said that they wanna have set items in D3 but as long as they are good, Or something like that), then rings might be among them.... the game isnt released yet and it has 2 wiki's, so no info is credible... and if no info is credible, then whats the point of having a wiki bout it? Some amount of guessing must be there.... --DxAxxxTyriel 20:35, 4 April 2009 (CEST)
