Difference between revisions of "User talk:Azymn/Wizard skills"

Revision as of 17:57, 18 March 2009

This page shows why I prefer separate pages for skills; There's, simply put, little info on the skills at the moment, so each section will most likely grow, making for a hu(uuuu)ge page. --Vipermagi 15:29, 14 March 2009 (CET)

I know what you mean, that's why I felt we should individualize the skills. I'll look in to it today as soon as I have had time to make the Wiki Watch =) --Leord 13:51, 16 March 2009 (CET)

I agree as well, I originally copied this straight from the wiki quite a while ago and I am only now getting to the point of modifying it. Here's my first real stab at it. --Azymn 07:20, 17 March 2009 (CET)

Looks good for a "first stab at it"...--belushi81x 15:32, 18 March 2009 (CET)

I agree, looks very good. I really like the way it looks, and using headlines inside the table is always a good idea with this type of article. The only thing is that people did like the summarized pages of the old D2 info pages, and I am hesitant to radically alter the way we display info from that. That's why I'm working on the little skill box template, for easy linkage.

Regardless, I do like the whole table, and I'm sure we can use it. Perhaps it works better in the Skills page? --Leord 18:57, 18 March 2009 (CET)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 :::Looks good for a "first stab at it"...--[[User:Belushi81x|belushi81x]] 15:32, 18 March 2009 (CET)
+::::I agree, looks very good. I really like the way it looks, and using headlines inside the table is always a good idea with this type of article. The only thing is that people did like the summarized pages of the old D2 info pages, and I am hesitant to radically alter the way we display info from that. That's why I'm working on the little skill box template, for easy linkage.
+::::Regardless, I do like the whole table, and I'm sure we can use it. Perhaps it works better in the [[Skill]]s page? --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 18:57, 18 March 2009 (CET)