Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thousand Pounder"
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
m (Gluttony Incarnate?) |
m |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton. | + | ==The Thousand Pounder's title== |
| + | Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton. -- 05:18, 16 September 2008 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :I've been thinking, maybe "Gluttony Incarnate" is the demon's name? By the way, even if I'm not able to find a quote, it was clearly stated that the Th. Pounder is not technically a Boss monster, it only serves as a cool-moment in the WWI video. A piece of the artowrk even shows multiple Pounders in action. [[User:Bandreus|Bandreus]] 09:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ::True, but it seems a bit over-kill to have a specific title for a monster type? I mean in terms of the encounter, it's definitely boss-related, even if a smaller boss. Difference between Th Pounder and any other monster is huge... It could have been a cool event they made for the demo, and they haven't specifically made the decision of using the th Pounder as a boss in the game? Concept art show a bunch of the buggers fighting a Barb... --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 11:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | :::Yeah, only wanted to point it out since the article seemed a bit misleading. I don't see any real problem in classifieing him under the boss category, yet since the developers firmly stated it is not a miny-boss I think this should have been reflected more clearly in the wiki. Guess finding the quote could be usefull? --[[User:Bandreus|Bandreus]] 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::For the sake of information quality, it would be good to add that, but more in the actual text I think. I mean, as he was presented was nothing short of a mini-boss, compared to how the barb slaughtered all other resistance... --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 13:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:30, 20 November 2009
The Thousand Pounder's title[edit source]
Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton. -- 05:18, 16 September 2008
- I've been thinking, maybe "Gluttony Incarnate" is the demon's name? By the way, even if I'm not able to find a quote, it was clearly stated that the Th. Pounder is not technically a Boss monster, it only serves as a cool-moment in the WWI video. A piece of the artowrk even shows multiple Pounders in action. Bandreus 09:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- True, but it seems a bit over-kill to have a specific title for a monster type? I mean in terms of the encounter, it's definitely boss-related, even if a smaller boss. Difference between Th Pounder and any other monster is huge... It could have been a cool event they made for the demo, and they haven't specifically made the decision of using the th Pounder as a boss in the game? Concept art show a bunch of the buggers fighting a Barb... --Leord 11:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, only wanted to point it out since the article seemed a bit misleading. I don't see any real problem in classifieing him under the boss category, yet since the developers firmly stated it is not a miny-boss I think this should have been reflected more clearly in the wiki. Guess finding the quote could be usefull? --Bandreus 13:35, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- For the sake of information quality, it would be good to add that, but more in the actual text I think. I mean, as he was presented was nothing short of a mini-boss, compared to how the barb slaughtered all other resistance... --Leord 13:30, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
