224
edits
Changes
→Azymn
::As for table/div: You'll please choose for me what would be most flexible in the long run. If we do add skins, we could just make the Skill box (and other boxes) into specific classes that can be fixed from the CSS. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 18:28, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
:::Skins:
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=standard Classic],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=simple Simple],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=nostalgia Nostalgia],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=myskin MySkin],
:::MonoBook (default),
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=monobook2 MonoBook2],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=cologneblue Cologne Blue],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=chick Chick],
:::[http://www.diablowiki.net/Special:Preferences?title=Main_Page&useskin=monobook-arsed MonoBook-arsed]
:::Only default Monobook doesn't look like shit, and Arsed is broken. Otoh, Monobook's the only skin with a limited width, which is annoying me to no end really, but that's besides the point. </ramble> --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 20:43, 9 April 2009 (CEST)
::::So, basically, you'd like there to be another skin where there is no limited width? =) I could possibly look in to this. We should really give you rights to do such edits anyway. Then we'd have two working skins, and possibly making a feature out of that, if people are pissed with limited width. I like it. It would obviously either have to be a similar colour css, or we'd have to make table formatting and classes for different boxes (etc) in both with different colours. --[[User:Leord|Leord]] 16:37, 16 April 2009 (CEST)
:::::Good find Vipermagi. It actually makes things much easier to have just one skin. This is basically the case now; all the themes Vipermagi listed aren't simply ugly, they're full-on broken. Multiple skins and a fluid layout would be a cool feature, but in this context we're relying on diverse user submissions. People might not be aware of the need to handle inherited styles when forcing inline formatting, and floating element layouts don't always look great when people aren't placing content with the idea in mind. I'm not saying we shouldn't do it, but realize it might be more work than expected to police and preview all content in multiple skins.
:::::--[[User:Azymn|Azymn]] 04:59, 18 April 2009 (CEST)