Difference between revisions of "Talk:Classes"
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
m (Shouldn't this be singular?) |
Jamesephyr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Shouldn't this be singular? --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 21:17, 3 September 2009 (CEST) | Shouldn't this be singular? --[[User:Vipermagi|Vipermagi]] 21:17, 3 September 2009 (CEST) | ||
| + | I think they should use the 'instability' way for the wizard sort of like how energy was for a rogue in wow but also add a skill that when is reduced to a point the wizard would either shape-shift into draconic being and or their spells would be enhanced or hindered as well. just opinion, this class for me as well as the game in its entirety is highly anticipated. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:09, 9 November 2010
Shouldn't this be singular? --Vipermagi 21:17, 3 September 2009 (CEST) I think they should use the 'instability' way for the wizard sort of like how energy was for a rogue in wow but also add a skill that when is reduced to a point the wizard would either shape-shift into draconic being and or their spells would be enhanced or hindered as well. just opinion, this class for me as well as the game in its entirety is highly anticipated.
