Difference between revisions of "Talk:Thousand Pounder"
ADVERTISEMENT
From Diablo Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton. | Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton. | ||
| − | I've been thinking, maybe "Gluttony Incarnate" is the demon's name? By the way, even if I'm not able to find a quote, it was clearly stated that the Th. Pounder is not technically a Boss monster, it only serves as a cool-moment in the WWI video. A piece of the artowrk even shows multiple Pounders in action. [[User:Bandreus|Bandreus]] | + | I've been thinking, maybe "Gluttony Incarnate" is the demon's name? By the way, even if I'm not able to find a quote, it was clearly stated that the Th. Pounder is not technically a Boss monster, it only serves as a cool-moment in the WWI video. A piece of the artowrk even shows multiple Pounders in action. [[User:Bandreus|Bandreus]] 09:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:27, 15 November 2009
Isn't it possible - likely, even - that the "Gluttony" and "Incarnate" titles under his name are one title, "Gluttony Incarnate"? It just incarnated, and it has the look of a glutton.
I've been thinking, maybe "Gluttony Incarnate" is the demon's name? By the way, even if I'm not able to find a quote, it was clearly stated that the Th. Pounder is not technically a Boss monster, it only serves as a cool-moment in the WWI video. A piece of the artowrk even shows multiple Pounders in action. Bandreus 09:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
